[gelatine bloom]Original title: Printing said that the relationship between India, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs: China is willing to properly control and control☆□◇, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs holds a routine reporter conference▼•▷□, and the spokesman Lu has answered the reporter. Q: Recently★-▪, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of India said that the relationship between India has been critical to the two countries, the region and the world. Printing is willing to develop bilateral relations based on common development in common, and deal with each other and to maintain their sensitive basis for each other◁△□, concerns and desires▷◇. What is Chinas comment? A▷▲▼…: We pay attention to the printed party=◇=★. Not long ago■•, Wang Yis Foreign Minister answered at China Indian Relations and explained the basic position of Chinas relationship between China and India. We are willing to use the printing party, with the guidance of the important consensus of the two leaders, enhance political mutual trust=▷●•, promote mutual benefit cooperation□-■□, properly control and control▷▽★, and promo•▽▽.
Rui Reference Wiqi “Change Entrance to China?” The truth is a bit complicated … Reference Message Network reported on May 27 (text / Tang Lixin) to add the sin□-, why no words□•. Not long ago▲◆, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin once revealed that the anti-China power used the rumors to attack Chinas routine, and a total of three steps: first explode with the so-called scholar, the victim, then the media followed into the speculation••, then the official echo intervention. Wang Wenbin is in touch with the issue of Xinjiang◇▲, but the recent events have shown that this routine is also used by some people, such as new crown viruses. They first played a “big brand”: US Presidential Chief Medical Adviser Ant▪●.
Original title: American Protectionism serious harm to the Global Economy This newspaper reporter Wang Wei USA has received attention in recent attention in China 301. Many expert scholars at home and abroad believe that the US 301 investigation is based on the US domestic law, and it is contrary to international rules with domestic law. The US single-sided protectionist action will cause serious harm to free trade and the global economy▲▽▷☆. “301 survey is initiated by the United States, survey•-, ruling, implementation◇•, strong single-sided color.” Bai Ming, deputy director of the International Market Research Institute of China University of Commerce, said 301 investigations have been opposed to countries around the world. Kasy Baugen, senior researcher in the United States Peterson International Economics, in the 301 investigation, the US government is both a policeman (judge whether the foreign government △▷△.Gelatin wholesale.